Difference between revisions of "Postgraduate Research"

From UCT EE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 96: Line 96:
  
 
= Writing a research proposal =
 
= Writing a research proposal =
==  Contents of proposal (from UCT Researchers guide) ==
+
The contents of a proposal, as given by the UCT Researchers guide, are as follows:
 
* Title: should give a clear indication of what the study is about
 
* Title: should give a clear indication of what the study is about
 
* Brief description of the area of research: locate the proposed research in its wider context
 
* Brief description of the area of research: locate the proposed research in its wider context
Line 110: Line 110:
 
* List of references: reference all literature used in the proposal
 
* List of references: reference all literature used in the proposal
  
== For Masters students (from UCT EBE postgrad handbook) ==
+
== For Masters students ==
 +
The following are taken from UCT EBE postgrad handbook:
 
* Clearly explain the research topic that will be investigated. Include a background section that describes the application and why this work is meaningful, ie has a real-life application and state all research objectives
 
* Clearly explain the research topic that will be investigated. Include a background section that describes the application and why this work is meaningful, ie has a real-life application and state all research objectives
 
* Include a literature survey that shows familiarity with the central literature within the broad field of study
 
* Include a literature survey that shows familiarity with the central literature within the broad field of study
Line 116: Line 117:
 
* Typical length of masters proposal is less than 10 pages and submitted 3 months after registration for research project
 
* Typical length of masters proposal is less than 10 pages and submitted 3 months after registration for research project
  
== PhD seminar should demonstrate the following (from UCT EBE postgraduate handbook) ==
+
== PhD Seminar ==
 +
A PhD Seminar should demonstrate the following (from UCT EBE postgrad handbook):
 
* The candidate is familiar with the main literature in the field
 
* The candidate is familiar with the main literature in the field
 
* There is sufficient scope in the topic for a PhD and there is clarity in the stated hypothesis and research questions/objectives
 
* There is sufficient scope in the topic for a PhD and there is clarity in the stated hypothesis and research questions/objectives
Line 123: Line 125:
 
* The method of research is sound and achievable and there is a clear knowledge of the experimental procedures to be used and the methodology to be pursued in analysing the results
 
* The method of research is sound and achievable and there is a clear knowledge of the experimental procedures to be used and the methodology to be pursued in analysing the results
  
== PhD proposal (from UCT Researchers guide) ==
+
== PhD proposal ==
A PhD proposal intends to:
+
A PhD proposal intends to (taken from UCT Researchers guide):
 
* Indicate the focus for research
 
* Indicate the focus for research
 
* Set out aims of the research project
 
* Set out aims of the research project

Revision as of 05:15, 11 March 2020


Overview

A special thanks to Dr Yunus Abdul Gaffar, The initial author of this initial guide.

For more resources pertaining to research in the EE Department at UCT, see Category:Research.

What is research

Research is a logical and systematic search for new and useful information on a particular topic. It is an investigation of finding solutions to problems through objective and systematic analysis.

What is design

Design is the process used to create something to solve a problem. Design involves the transformation of an initial user requirement to produce documentation instructions on how to realise the end product. In determining a solution, barriers must be overcome. A design assignment, there, is an engineering problem and involves sub-problems that must be addressed.

The design process typically consists of the following steps:

  1. User requirements: client describes the problem and constraints (time, budget, using specific components) that the solution must fit within. Engage with client to understand who is going to use the product, where is it going to be used and how often, and for how long (lifespan) is it going to be used. Separate the core requirements from the ‘nice to have’ ones
  2. Technical requirements: translate the user requirements into concise technical requirements that contain technical jargon.
  3. Identify multiple solutions: synthesises a range of potential solutions to the problem or a range of approaches to developing a solution that is consistent with assumptions, premises, limitations and constraints
  4. Evaluates the potential approaches against criteria. Examples of criteria include cost, efficiency, performance, reliability
  5. Chooses a preferred approach and presents reasonable arguments to justify this decision
  6. Develops the full design of the selected option. This can include developing a functional-flow block diagram for the proposed solution, and a block diagram showing the major sub-systems + interfaces between sub-systems: for each subsystem, identify multiple solutions and justify your choice based on the requirements and constraints of the system
  7. Test each sub-system to ensure that it is functioning accurately as expected
  8. Perform integration and testing: Build prototype and perform testing. Assess if system technical requirement are met
  9. Develop improved prototype by iterating through steps 6 -> 7 -> 8 . The more iterations are done, the better the quality of the developed system.
  10. Produces design documentation for implementation. A design document provides detailed information or the ‘blueprint’ to implement the proposed solution.

Postgraduate studies

Note: keeping a research journal throughout your postgraduate studies can be useful to document ideas, problems, notes and reminders. During measurement trials, this is especially useful and will help a lot in the write up phase. A journal can be a hardcover book, or a word document, a blog or a combination of these.

Masters Degree

A Masters degree is training to equip candidates with skills necessary for further independent research. The dissertation should demonstrate that a candidate has the ability to be adequately acquainted with the relevant literature, has mastered appropriate techniques and analytic methods, assess the significance of findings in a thorough and logically-coherent manner, shows evidence of critical and independent thought and the write-up of the dissertation is satisfactory in presentation and literature style. The dissertation does not need to involve original research or distinctly advance knowledge of the subject.

PhD Degree

A PhD degree shows that a candidate can work independently and make an original, significant and meaningful contribution that adds to the existing body of knowledge. Student must demonstrate that he/she is working at the cutting edge and at the academic forefront in the topic. Evidence of a ‘significant contribution’ includes publishing in accredited journals and writing a good quality, polished PhD thesis. The ideas relating to the original contribution of the PhD work should come directly from the PhD candidate and not from the supervisor. This shows that the PhD candidate can think creatively, which is one of the skills that it certified when a PhD degree is granted. Examples of an original contribution can include:


Critical and creative thinking are two important outcomes of a PhD degree. Research what these are and how to further develop your critical and creative thinking skills.

A PhD degree is typically examined in the context of the scientific process, which is made up of the following steps

  1. Research questions are stated
  2. Background research is done
  3. A clear, concise and achievable hypothesis is carefully phrased
  4. The hypothesis is tested by doing an experiment
  5. The data obtained from experiments is analysed and conclusions are drawn

Choosing a field of study and a research topic

There is a difference between a field of study and a broad research topic. Examples of a field are “passive radar”, ‘radar imaging’, ‘cognitive radar’. Examples of a research topic is “Optimum placement of receivers for FM-based passive radar for detection and tracking of aircraft” or “Radar imaging of small boats in high sea states”.

A field of study is more general and does not focus on a problem. A research topic is more focused and does focus on a problem. When looking for a field to work in, look at ‘hot-topics’, ie topics that there are recent publications in journals and conferences and researchers are actively trying to advance the field by contributing knowledge

When choosing a broad research topic, ensure:

  • You are interested in the topic and developing/applying the skills required to complete the research. You are going to spend many months on this single topic and being passionate about is a key ingredient.
  • Topic is not ‘saturated’, ie not have so many publications that there is little room left to make an original contribution.
  • Enough literature that a critical literature survey can be written to show understanding of the published literature and the recent findings
  • You have the time/budget/skills to develop a radar to get measured data or have access to equipment/radar to get measured data to sufficiently address your research objectives. Or, use existing good quality measured datasets. For new fields of study, measured data might not be critical. Theory and simulations may be enough.
  • A simulator can be developed to obtained simulated data to compare against measured data and to generate simulated data for scenarios that is difficult/time-consuming to measure
  • ‘Nice to have’: recent books on the field/topic, IEEE journal or magazine review on the field/topic, accept to experts (supervisor, industry partner, international expert), dissertations/thesis on the topic, existing datasets for initial analysis to get an understanding/appreciation for the complexity of the problem

The next step is to fine-tune the broad research topic to a more focus topic, then to phrase research objectives or research questions.

It is challenging to refine a broad research topic or to identify a ‘good research problem’. There are many problems out there: some are solvable and others are not, some are important and some are not. A ‘good research problem’ is one that is both solvable and important. The process of finding a ‘good research problem’ involves:

  • reading the literature to understand what has been done and the boundaries of existing knowledge. However, if you spent too much time reading the literature and believing everything, you’ll never notice the flaws. While experts that publish are knowledgeable in their area, they rarely admit what they don’t know. Furthermore, experts have biases and work within hidden constraints. If you don’t read the literature enough, you may have doubts of what can be achieved. Reading the literature requires a balance. Hamming suggests reading the literature until the problem becomes reasonably clear. Then stop reading the literature and think through the problem yourself and brainstorm solutions. Think about how you would slightly change the problem to be the ‘solvable’. In conclusion, reading to find solutions does not lead to great research.

PhD students: the PhD candidate leads the process to identifying and refining the topic. This is because the journey of "finding the problem" and "clarifying the problem" is part of the PhD work. It is a skill that every PhD candidate needs to learn. If your supervisor gives you a clear topic + hypothesis + research objectives, and clearly outlines your methodology, what data should be used and what outcomes to expect, then this is more master’s research than independent PhD research.

Roles of the students and the supervisor

Responsibility of the students (from UCT EBE postgraduate handbook)

  • To accept that the primary responsibility for his/her education rests with the student. This includes selecting a topic for research, setting up meetings and developing and managing a plan to complete your postgraduate studies.
  • To demonstrate a reasonable work ethic and to make every effort to meet the normal throughput rate (2 years for a Masters student, 4 years for a PhD student)
  • To share ideas and to work collegially
  • To participate in and to contribute to the life of the department
  • To assist in the mentoring and orientation of fellow students from outside Cape Town
  • To commit to co-publication with the supervisor
  • To commit to constructive feedback at the end of the process

Responsibility of the supervisor (from UCT EBE postgraduate handbook)

  • To provide quality supervision on a regular basis (as a guideline, a minimum of one hour per week)
  • To respond timeously to the submission of written work requiring feedback.
  • To arrange for a suitable replacement if the supervisor is absent for a lengthy period (more than 3 weeks)
  • To treat the student with unfailing respect and politeness
  • Providing an opportunity for the student to teach undergraduate students in the candidate's area of growing expertise
  • To organise a seminar by the student, involving staff and senior students in the Department
  • To facilitate postgraduate students, on a voluntary basis, playing a mentoring role to undergraduate students
  • To assist in the incorporation of the student into the social life of the department

UCT Memorandum of Understanding between student and supervisor

  • Clarifies responsibilities between supervisor and candidate
  • Contains a plan of work for the next 12 months or up to completion. Important milestones should be clarified
  • For returning students, it contains a comparison of last year’s plan with the actual progress achieved

Writing a research proposal

The contents of a proposal, as given by the UCT Researchers guide, are as follows:

  • Title: should give a clear indication of what the study is about
  • Brief description of the area of research: locate the proposed research in its wider context
  • The research questions: Crisply stated single question that can later be broken down into multiple sub-questions
  • Rationale: gives a motivation of why you chose this area of research and what contribution the completed research work will make to our understanding of the field.
  • Literature review: Sufficient insight of the literature to justify the research questions. Locates the proposed research in the context of existing work. Literature survey must have a direct link to the problem/questions/objectives being addressed in the thesis.
  • Research methods: These indicate what techniques/methods to be used to address the research objectives.
  • Research design: Addresses how the project will be broken down and what key decisions need to be made
  • Data collection and analysis: what data will be collected (simulated? Measured?). How will data be collected? How data will be analysed to fully address the research objectives stated in the work
  • Research ethics: If the project involves working with humans or animals, ethics approval needs to be obtained before the search begins.
  • Thesis outline: prove a preliminary outline of the dissertation/thesis, indicating chapter and heading titles
  • Timeline: short research plan identifying milestones and how the research work and write-up will be completed in the specified time
  • List of references: reference all literature used in the proposal

For Masters students

The following are taken from UCT EBE postgrad handbook:

  • Clearly explain the research topic that will be investigated. Include a background section that describes the application and why this work is meaningful, ie has a real-life application and state all research objectives
  • Include a literature survey that shows familiarity with the central literature within the broad field of study
  • Provide clarity on the research methods or the methodology used to achieve the research objectives stated
  • Typical length of masters proposal is less than 10 pages and submitted 3 months after registration for research project

PhD Seminar

A PhD Seminar should demonstrate the following (from UCT EBE postgrad handbook):

  • The candidate is familiar with the main literature in the field
  • There is sufficient scope in the topic for a PhD and there is clarity in the stated hypothesis and research questions/objectives
  • The candidate has the right background, undergraduate degree and ability to undertake the work
  • The potential contribution to knowledge has been identified and there is a clear definition of the key questions to be addressed in the context of the proposed hypothesis
  • The method of research is sound and achievable and there is a clear knowledge of the experimental procedures to be used and the methodology to be pursued in analysing the results

PhD proposal

A PhD proposal intends to (taken from UCT Researchers guide):

  • Indicate the focus for research
  • Set out aims of the research project
  • Indicate how the student intends to achieve those aims
  • Provide a benchmark which progress is measured and adjustments made
  • Typical length of PhD proposal is between 15 – 20 pages and can take 6 weeks to 6 months to complete

Broad Chapters of a Research proposal

Problem statement or research objectives

Theory related to your research objectives

Critical literature survey

Design process

Practical work

Results and discussion on results

Conclusion and Future work

Writing up dissertation/thesis

How external examiners mark dissertations/theses